The School Health Assessment is used to reflect on an existing school partnership and the commitments and outcomes of that partnership. Please complete this rubric for each of your school partner(s) to identify areas that are successful and/or require improvement. We recommend using this rubric as a tool to prepare for school partner meetings at the beginning, middle or end of the year.
Check out the rubric below or download here.
General | |
School Partner Name |
|
Years Partnered with School |
|
Program Team at School | Supervisior: PCs: |
Program Data | |
Enrollment | 9: ___ students enrolled; __ students matched; __% matched 10: ___ students enrolled; __ students matched; __% matched 11: ___ students enrolled; __ students matched; __% matched 12: ___ students enrolled; __ students matched; __% matched |
Classes | Number of classes scheduled: ___
|
Engagement | __% pairs meeting online benchmark |
__% pair met 0 times __% pairs met 3 times __% pairs met 6 or more times __% of pairs met 1 time __% pairs met 4 times __% of pairs met 2 times __% pairs met 5 times | |
Advising | __% of mentees completed application __% of mentees completed FAFSA |
Important School Data | Attendance Rate: Graduation Rate: Other Relevant School Data: |
School Health | |
Are we able to run our program with full fidelity in the school? Indicated by: Weekly classes & monthly events scheduled and supported, whole school enrollment or fully scheduled and supported cohort model, school staff supports student engagement in program | Yes-all the time Yes-most of the time No-rarely No-never |
Is mentor2.0 partnering with school to support student post-secondary advising? Indicated by: mentor2.0 staff has direct access to systems and information, staff is invited to and participates as a member in post-secondary meetings, there are clear roles and responsibilities in completing advising tasks | Yes-all the time Yes-most of the time No-rarely No-never |
Is there a working partnership between mentor2.0 and the school? Indicated by: School availability for key meetings (BOY, MY, EOY) and other meetings as needed, strong collaboration with partner teachers, mentor2.0 invited to participate in key school events, school supports mentor2.0 partnership with parents, potential fee for service | Yes-all the time Yes-most of the time No-rarely No-never |
Is there effective communication between mentor2.0 and the school? Indicated by: school leaders and staff are responsive to outreach from mentor2.0, mentor2.0 staff have a school e-mail address and included on essential/grade-relevant listservs, mentor2.0 PCs are included on necessary communications around school functions, scheduling, etc. | Yes-all the time Yes-most of the time No-rarely No-never |
Is mentor2.0 partnering with school to support in scheduling? Indicated by: inclusion in the planning process in scheduling classes at BOY, updates provided as changes occur, consistency with classes week-to-week | Yes-all the time Yes-most of the time No-rarely No-never |
If no for any of the above questions, please give more details:
| |
Is there anything important to know about how mentor2.0 is showing up in this school (staffing challenges or shifts, matching delays, etc…):
| |
Top 3 Strengths of School Partnership
| |
Top 3 Challenges of School Partnership
| |
Based on the above rubric and reflection, what are next steps for a successful program (i.e. meet with administration around specific challenges, establish strategies for increasing co-teacher collaboration, explore new school partnerships, etc.). This section can be used internally and/or with your Partnership Manager.
| |
